|
The inabilty to hire is seriously restricting your company's ability to do business. |
Before getting involved in an automation project, you must be confident that there is a return. |
Test your resolve. . . . . and your focus |
||||
Living in Alberta, we are faced with a constant barrage from the media about labour shortages.
And a shortage there is. 48% of businesses had jobs vacant for over 4 months last year. All
sectors are affected – Retail, Manufacturing, Oil Patch, and Professional.
A few months ago, I drove through the industrial areas of Calgary, and in under 2 hours, I had
pictures of over 50 different sign
s by companies trying to hire – often with enticements like
signing and retention bonuses. Is this our fate, to struggle with a labour shortage? The bigger
issue is more fundamental – it’s how we are using the employees that we already have. So
whether you can find all the staff you think you need or not, you may already be overstaffed.
The key is in how efficient your processes – your plant’s
system really work.
One company that I worked with was feeling the same
labour shortage as everyone else. Their solution was to use
workers supplied by a temporary employment service to fill
the shortfall. Over a period of just under two minutes I
watched an individual make up three boxes. All that was
required was to open the box up, fold in the two short flaps,
then the two long flaps, and a single piece of packing tape
lengthwise down the long seam.
This person, wanting to do a good job, as most of our
people do, placed three strips along the long seam, then two more across the width of the box.
To make the next box, he walked 10 feet, got a single box, returned, and continued as before.
A simple job that should take under 15 seconds to complete took 40. This is a classic example of what happens when procedures are not laid out, and
supervision is stretched. I know it’s only a box, but there still needs to be a procedure, albeit
a simple one, and probably just a picture, to assist this man on the correct methods.
How much time do we waste doing things the long way or the hard
way because we have not clearly identified the best practices for
the operation? And how many people on your payroll are a drain
on your bottom line, instead of adding value to it? It’s hard to find
an organization without at least one person like our box-maker. If
you are a medium sized manufacturer, it’s not hard to find several.
This is just the low hanging fruit. And this is always the first
savings that you go after. But in every organization, there are a
significant number of opportunities for improvement that are not as
obvious (Even the low hanging fruit may not be obvious to
someone who sees it every day). That’s where an outside set of
eyes can pay huge benefits.
By optimizing the processes in your plant, you will find huge
benefits in terms of reduced lead times, improved customer
service, reduced variable manufacturing costs, improved quality,
and even more satisfied workers.
Just be certain that the people that you bring in have the
qualifications and the ability to review the entire plant as a system
– from sales and service through shipping. Always keep in your
mind the butterfly effect – that when a butterfly flaps his wings, the
effect is felt round the world. Your plant is the same – making a
change here may cause a huge problem there, unless the entire
process is considered. And that’s what you are looking for when
seeking outside help. The rewards are well worth it. There really is
profit in your process!
Before getting involved in an automaton project, you must be confident that there is a solid
business reason for doing so. Payback is the best reason, reducing your total manufacturing cost
per widget is a great way to improve the bottom line.
Lack of skilled people is another. When in the middle of a serious labour shortage, finding
enough people to do the necessary work is a constant challenge. Replacing the need for
additional people through the use of automation is a good reason to consider a project.
Sometimes the specifics of the job are too much of a challenge for people to do. This
could be because of the precision required, or the physical needs of the job, be it heavy
lifting, repetitive operations, or simply monotonous work. Automating to prevent injuries is
a great reason to initiate a project.
Our automation audit looks at the objective of a project, the feasibility of doing it, projected
costs, and the overall benefit to the project. Usually the benefit is in dollars, but sometimes
the reasons are to ensure continuity of production, and injury prevention.
Finally, we look at how it integrates into the rest of the plant operations. If completing the
project only serves to create problems elsewhere, then it ceases to be a viable project.
Find more answers at www.coolrunning.ca "Ask Ed"
When setting up a safety
program, the first thing to look at
is the level of commitment on
the part of the senior managers,
starting with the owner, or the
General Manager.
It never ceases to amaze me
that there are some who have managed to be in
the envied position of running a company but
don’t ‘get’ the people side of the business
equation. They don’t recognize that they set the
tone for the plant, and that the “do as I do” drive is very strong with their employees.
This applies whether the manager takes every Friday afternoon off to play golf, or whether he wears his safety shoes when he comes out into the plant.
So if you are looking for an effective program, the people who are going to make that happen for you are your supervisors and middle managers, not through words, but through your actions!
Let me give you an example. I was once involved in a plant that supplied product to the food industry. Because of that, they were legally bound to follow certain rules in the plant. The most fundamental of those rules was the wearing of hairnets. All personnel in the plant were required to wear them, except that the Plant Manager and the General Manager always seem to forget them when they came out on the plant floor. Neither of them really bought into the program, and hence, after hours when supervision was minimal, off came the hairnets. If the senior managers didn’t need them, then obviously, neither did the workers.

Your workforce is your extended family. In many plants, this is very much the case. It would be just as difficult for you to see one of your employees injured as one of your own family. Implementing a strong safety program just makes sense to protect those who are most important to you.
Productivity by your workers is improved. It’s simply the law of reciprocity. People will do more for you when you do more for them. That’s human nature. When you demonstrate that you truly care about their well being, that you demand that they work safely above all else, then that is returned by your workers in the only way that they can. They work harder, they work more diligently, quality is improved and output is increased.
It improves employee morale. If you have issues with employee turnover, with poor quality, and people in general not caring, don’t look to the employees for the cause – look to yourself. When people feel respected, cared for, and of value, your workforce will be much more likely to stay with you and work for you. Your turnover will drop, and in the tough labour market that we are in, that alone is reason enough to implement a safety program. Now safety alone is but one part of this – how you treat your employees in general is the real key. If you really believe in the value of your employees, then the other parts will come along.
It’s the law! This is a really lousy reason to do anything. Whether you are driving through a playground zone, or building a garage on the back of your house, laws primarily exist to ensure that people do the right thing.
By mid-year, Alberta has handed out $3.6 Million in fines for violations of workplace safety. Compare that to all of 2007 where $1.7 Million was handed out, and you will start to understand that WCB is getting tough on safety (as they should) and Bill C-45 is the muscle that allows them to do so. If you have an accident in your plant, and if you have and inadequate program, or inadequate enforcement of an otherwise good program, you will be fined. And not just the company - you can also be personally fined! And there are no upper limits for the value of the fines where gross negligence is charged. Or perhaps you, and the injured employee will be lucky this time. The accident will be minor and they will only close your plant until you can prove that you have an adequate program in place. What’s the real cost of that?
Are we starting to feel committed yet? It’s hard to admit, even to ourselves that we don’t care about the safety and well being of our employees. Down deep, I doubt if that is ever really the case. More likely, it is simply not made a priority. What difference does it make if you go on the plant floor without your ear plugs or safety shoes? You won’t be out there for very long, and you’re in the aisles so the risk of injury is pretty small. You may be right abut the risk, but in the eyes of your employees, you appear not to care.
Can you expect them to feel differently?